The Indian Constitution is both rigid and flexible, i. In compliance with Article of the Indian Constitution, a provision must be made in any of the houses, which must be passed by a large majority or by a simple majority later. If a vote approves the resolution, it will be submitted to the president for his assent. In 70 years of Indian Independence, the constitution has been amended times.
Starting with Articles and 8 Schedules, it now stands at more than Articles and 12 Schedules — arising from amendments. Under Article of the Indian Constitution, the Parliament is empowered to amend it and its procedures. Amendments to the Indian Constitution are not easy to produce and require compliance with other provisions.
Article grants Parliament some powers allowing it to amend it while keeping its fundamental form just the same. Article of the Constitution of India cites two types of amendments to the Constitution of India. The Constitution needs to be revised. If the constitutional changes were not made, we would not be able to encounter the future difficulties and it would become a hurdle in the path of development.
There is an explanation of why our founding fathers made the constitution as robust as it is today. In the Kesavanand Bharati case of , the Supreme Court ruled that the Parliament could not change certain provisions which constitute the basic constitutional framework. Constitutional ideologies which are essential to constitutional survival. It notes that some basic legislative frameworks and founding values constitute the foundation of the Constitution.
The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress. Al-Jazeera says bureau chief detained by Sudanese forces. In Texas, 'sanctuary cities' pass their own anti-abortion laws. Home Nation. Did you know? Constitution has been amended times India has a history of amending its Constitution so often that it becomes hard to remember its original intent in the Indian context.
But history offers some guidance. Such a demystified, pragmatic view of law suggests legal constitutions are technologies for governing, designed and implemented to bring about socially negotiated outcomes. The history of the Indian state and constitution includes a pragmatic American influence, with which the US would now benefit being reacquainted. Politics, in other words, compelled a historic constitutional transformation.
In , as India looked ahead to its nascent republic status, its new Constituent Assembly planned extensive land reforms. An Indian landlord equipped with a copy of the American due process clause might expect to find the new Indian Supreme Court willing to stand by him and, as the US Supreme Court first tried to do with the New Deal, thwart the democratic reforms of the legislature.
The US can learn something from this little history lesson. Every constitution offers a particular set of solutions to a social, economic and cultural context. India did not copy the US Constitution; it took what worked for it and no more. Recycled medals, podiums: Tokyo passes sustainable test.
Future space travel might require mushrooms. Team India gets emotional after losing to Belgium. Sport or martial art? What will the Earth be like in years? Hockey star's dad sold cow to buy son's goalkeeper kit.
Indian Constitution: First amendment, and the last. Lok Sabha has passed constitution amendment bills.
0コメント