Lower-end video cards may struggle playing in p, but the newer the card is the more likely it will play video back without a problem. The FLV video format that's used frequently for streaming video does not play back through the video card, it plays back through the CPU. FLV playback is a mixed bag because it can play back in p easily on a computer with a low-end video card and a fast CPU or play back poorly on a computer with a high-end video card and a slow CPU.
Graphics-heavy games, video-editing software and graphics-design applications all have substantially higher video card requirements than desktop and video playback at p. The actual graphics card requirements vary between programs and resolutions. However, games are usually able to degrade other graphical aspects to handle running at a p resolution.
Buying a new TV can be a fun-filled adventure — but also an agonizing nightmare. But what do they mean? As far as TV lingo goes, the more pixels there are, the better the picture quality. To understand why, though, we have to look at each resolution a bit more closely. Only then can you start considering what screen size is best and finally start taking a look at our list of the best 4K TVs to find the television of your dreams.
From a proper viewing distance, thousands of them blend to make the image on your screen. There's really no reason to go for a 4K on a phone because it requires more power and more materials that amps up the costs.
Having more pixels, means more energy, which means a bigger battery. The distinctive difference between 4K resolution to p in such a small screen is so small, which explains why the trend for 4K resolution has not taken off in the smartphone industry.
Should you be shooting at p or 4k for a p edit? October 4, Beginner , Editing , Video. The 4K - PROS More flexibility due to the ability to zoom in without losing quality 4K footage will deliver a higher quality downsampled image Future-proofing - easy to switch to a 4k edit in the future Proxy editing is better than it's ever been As tempting as the pros of 4K sounds, there are also reasons when you might not want to shoot in 4K. Here are some questions to help you to decide between p or 4k for your edit: What are you filming?
A music video, vlog, feature film, commercial, or how to -videos? Where will your video be shown? Social media, TV, or on a large screen? As mentioned above, 4K is ideal for bigger screens.
What about i compared to p, is there a big difference? Or is it just about the same as p? Because most if all tv stations broadcast i signals, so the only true p picture would be blu ray, so my question is, would there be any big difference between i and p? If so would the distance still be 10 feet? In fact most players slow the draw cycle down to only 24Hz, ever see this; P Your human eyeball can only really see or process just about 22 Hz any way.
There simply is not enough bandwidth to provide the signal, yet. Guess what also, 4K is only at 30 Hz also! A direct connection to the data stream is only possible on a computer, for now. Plug a laptop into a TV. Turn everything on at set resolution to Now bring up any Web page. Finally go sit where you normally sit to watch TV.
CAN you read anything on the page? I questioned the need for 4K for the same reasons that Carlton discusses: Resolution -vs- distance compared to ocular physiology. My original conclusion was that at a normal TV viewing distance, 4K would not be perceived, nor would it increase enjoyment. I recommended putting the money and effort into a better sound system, better black levels, or redecorating the room to be a theater-style shadow box.
If you scroll through the comments to my article, you will see that I have completely retracted that opinion. The assumptions that Carlton and I made concerning physiology were based on the packing density of rods in a human retina—and perhaps field tests of visual discrimination.
But this fails to account for our ability to discriminate acutance, which is caused by lightwave diffraction and interference. Your brain can perceive acutance far beyond the grid resolution of a subtended angle. And it is more than just a marginal gain. A TV scan rate or motion index of provides a very tangible benefit for sports and fast moving scenes, especially if the original event was shot direct to video with the same parameters.
And incidentally, most individuals can see an annoying flicker at any frame rate less than Hz. For this reason, fluorescent light ballasts use full wave rectifiers if the voltage converter does not chop at high speed for reasons of trasnsforner efficiency.
For this same reason, 60Hz TVs are built with long-glowing phosphors. And even with long-glow phosphor, these TVS may fool the eye into thinking that the picture is retained, but they still leave the brain unsatisfied, because the motion is stuttered. Of course, this is not typically a problem, because as Jason points out the original media is at 24 or 32 fps. Sorry but, even P can be streamed at a decent quality with a 3 Meg stream and 4K can be achieved with about an 8 to 10 Meg stream.
Truth is, your numbers are ambiguous. As far as I am concerned movie or TV show enjoyment depends on the following in this order, content, sound and then visuals. Lets face it, these days media offerings suck. It has been proven that better sound is more important to how much you enjoy a program than video. It was awesome. The comment about content quality is a red herring.
No one says that the content has to be from Hollywood or of this century. Surely, you acknowledge that there are some films or documentaries worth watching or sharing with friends! Sound is certainly important to the theater experience. In fact, I tend to place it higher than moving beyond HD resolution. Is it more important, even if the choice is between upgrading already decent sound but lacking a 2nd sub-woofer -vs- upgrading a p video monitor at 15 fps?
Although, I dispute that one can rank video, audio and content relative to each other, I believe that two factors are often overlooked and for many viewers can lead to a greatly improved experience: a Thundering bass, b Extreme blacks with super-wide dynamic range. For projection theater as opposed to an active screen, such as LED or plasma , attaining b requires a screen with some gain to avoid scattering and a blackout box.
Without a black box, the contrast and dynamic range will be shot, because unlike a television screen, a projection screen is white. I have a small media room 4m x 3. I want to put projector as it will not be used very often.
0コメント